The Language Behind Dawkins’ Selfish Gene Theory :: Science Selfish Gene Theory Essays

The Language Behind Dawkins Selfish Gene Theory accord to Michael Polanyi, our understanding of a concept depends in part on the phraseology we use to describe it. Connie Barlows book, From Gaia to Selfish Genes, looks at metaphors in apprehension as integral parts of nigh new biological theories. unrivalled example is Richard Dawkins guess about the selfish gene, where he claims that the most provideonic unit of tender-heartedity, the gene, is a selfish entity unto itself that exists outside the realm of our individual unplayful and serves its own distinct purpose. Dawkins looks at the evolutionary process, how DNA replicates in forming human life, and the possibility that there is a social parallel to genetics, where human traits can be culturally transmitted. Dawkins, in the excerpts that Barlow has chosen, uses heavily metaphoric language to develop these scientific concepts to the general public. However, the language that Dawkins uses, while thought provoking, also carries some negative implications that extend beyond his theory. The selfish gene theory has legion(predicate) positive aspects, but its metaphors detract in certain ways from the scientific message of Richard Dawkins. The metaphor behind Dawkins theory can best be described by his opening statement we are survival machines-robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes (Barlow 193). Dawkins links the natural manner of unconscious bunches of nucleic acid (genes) to human behavior and personality by employment them selfish. His use of this term conjures up the image of a separate individual, confident of making decisions to help its own good and disregarding our needs. By craft human beings survival machines and robots, Dawkins suggests some serious moral implications regarding our existence. If we were just robots, it would come along that we would be no longer responsible for our actions, as people could associate all evil to th e gene programmers who created these robots. Also, if our primary purpose were to serve as a survival machine for something else, life would seem insignificant. John Maynard metalworker writes that Dawkins book is just about evolution, and not about morals . . . or about the human sciences (195). However, the attempt to disengage the selfish gene theory from its moral implications is seriously undermined by Dawkins metaphors. The origin of the selfish gene, and of evolution itself, began in something Dawkins calls the primeval soup, where protein molecules, by pure chance, bonded together to form replicators, the ancestors of DNA (198).